Since yesterday, the UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan is again in the Syrian capital Damascus and he now wants to sign the final papers with the Syrian government for the use of UN observers in Syria.
Upon his arrival, Kofi Annan took the time to condemn the massacre of al-Houla (Hula/al-Houleh) and called for an investigation of the events in this place, which apparently only got this name by an intervention of the dubious “Syrian National Council” (SNC) and the scheming of Google / Google Maps.
Already yesterday, Kofi Annan met with the Syrian Foreign Minister al-Muallem, and will talk with the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad today, before he will hold talks with representatives of the opposition.
Annan’s visit presents an important point in terms of implementing the peace plan, but the recent massacre of al-Houla (Hula) is like a Damocles sword above him and his mission. The so-called six-point peace plan by Kofi Annan for Syria is still officially promoted and, in public, the West sees this plan as the only solution for the situation in Syria.
What is unofficially going on behind the scenes within the NATO governments can only be guessed. Considering the fragments that falsely have slipped to the outside or the information and statements by NATO countries, which do not fit to the facts or even do not match together, a lot is really questionable.
As before the massacre in Houla is maintained, the propaganda against Syria continues and the Western representatives know very well whom they have to blame for the brutal slaying of civilians. But all this is not so sure. There are more questions than answers to the “Hula massacre”. Although everybody demands an investigation of this horrible incident (at least officially) and although it was not the only massacre in the last days, the offender is already determined for the Western NATO vassals and their Arab Gulf friends.
But anyone who has followed the news coverage about this horrible massacre near the Syrian city of Homs should have noticed how the content of the events has been repeatedly changed. The descriptions of the events in and around al-Houla (Hula/Houlah) have repeatedly changed. This is particularly striking with the published statements by the head of the UN Observer mission in Syria, the statements of the Norwegian Major General Robert Mood.
While the Norwegian Major General Robert Mood was cited with these words by Reuters on Sunday: “Whoever started it, whoever has always responded, and whoever has made this deplorable act of violence, should be held accountable,”, one was able to read the following statement of Maj. Gen. Mood today (e.g. at the German state media channel ZDF): “I urge the (Syrian) government to urgently stop any use of violence in all its forms.
Those who use violence to achieve their own goals, will force even more instability, generate even more unpredictable situations and the country might slip a step closer to civil war.” Two almost contradictory statements, though one must assume that the clear condemnation of the Syrian government was put into his mouth, at least, by the German State media.
This is nothing new. ARD, ZDF are known to publish willfully false translations, transcriptions or to change statements. In the end, it`s state media of Germany and Germany is under pressure by foreign governments and organizations. The West wants to topple the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Because of the previously proposed plan did not work, the West, together with Gulf allies and e.g. Turkey, are now working to find new ways to push Assad out of the way (to understand both literally and figuratively). That the allegedly massacre of al-Houla should now play a major role, can be seen, for example, in the attention that is drawn to it and how it is always kept as an issue of the international press, while naming the main culprit, also without results of investigations, so that just nobody forgets who is the bad guy in the Middle East.
Western mass media have lost the dogmas of journalism, already years ago. Not only because of economic interests, but also because of pressures from outside. Investigative journalism is a fairy tale, just as the designation “moderate Islamists” for Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood.
Al-Houla raises more questions than it delivers answers. Not even the sequence of events is really clear. Each side has its representation and the West, which has supposedly no journalists on the spot, at least, no independent, uses statements of allegedly witnesses and so-called (ominous) activists, as usually. But who asserts that these statements are correct? Nobody.
If one follows the mainstream media reporting about al-Houla, one can only see that the condemnation of this massacre near the Syrian city of Homs is rightly. Western mainstream media are selling the image that the Syrian government is to blame.
But why does one not read nothing of the conscience or the religious affiliation of those who were massacred in Hula (al-Houla/Houleh)? Why do Western main stream media keep the voices out of their coverage of the “Hula massacre”, who are saying something about this and other backgrounds? Just ask the easy question, who benefits from this?
These reports should have the same attention like the other unconfirmed reports get, which are willfully used as sources for Western media. It is said that many victims were from the al-Kard tribe, a tribe in Syria which is known to support the Syrian government. Against this backdrop, the question appears:
Why should the Syrian army behind this massacre against supporters of the Syrian government? In addition, some makes really no sense if one wants to really stick to the story that it should have been the Syrian army, which has executed these people.
If this massacre was ordered by the Syrian government, why did the responsible people not care about all the corpses, so that members of the terrorist “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) were able to photograph and film all the victims and use the videos and pictures for their purposes?
So much stupidity and thoughtlessness cannot be given to the Syrian government in Damascus and also the Syrian army is not so stupid. The armed “rebels” have achieved what they wanted with their depiction of the massacre: the armed gangs wanted to boost the debate about a military intervention in Syria.
The Islamists council in Istanbul, Turkey, has been calling for an active support and an intervention from the outside for quite some time. The “Syrian National Council” (SNC) can be called an Islamists council because the majority of members are Islamists, confirmed by e.g. Reuters and opposition members.
The “Syrian National Council” (SNC) in Turkey is not really interested in political talks and favors a military intervention in Syria. At least, this dubious council in Istanbul wants officially support for the armed gangs in Syria to fight against the Syrian President al-Assad and the government in the capital Damascus.
The massacre was now right, especially so close to Annan’s visit in Damascus and to boost the debate about military strikes against Syria. In fact, the U.S. chief of staff, Dempsey, approved in public now the military readiness of U.S. troops if the diplomatic pressure is no longer sufficient. Whether these statements are just threats or not is undecided. The fact is that NATO troops informally, also foreign mercenaries, are already active on Syrian soil, covered by the West, and paid by the Gulf States.
In addition to the requirements for intervention from the ranks of the questionable “Syrian National Council” (SNC), also the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood had a clear message to Syria now. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which has made a deal with the U.S. administration some time ago, calls on all Arab, Islamic and other countries to intervene in Syria and to help the Syrian people.
The battle cries to implement democracy in Syria are repeatedly used. But with violence, weapons and religious fanaticism, this is no good condition to create democracy in a foreign country.
All NATO slaves are not really interested to bring democracy to Syria. These phrases are commonly used to cover real interests. The Western people like democracy and freedom, thus they are influenced with such phrases. The West and its Gulf allies do not care about the Syrian people, they never did. The “Syrian National Council”, based in Istanbul, has also confirmed that this council does not care about the Syrians in Syria.
They want to weaken Syria and to eliminate the anti-imperialist leaders, thus a puppet government can be implemented. Syria would be the next client state after e.g. Jordan and Egypt. The leadership of Syria is not only a huge thorn in the eyes of the imperialists, but also a huge thorn in the eyes of the Gulf monarchies, Gulf regimes.
These Gulf States like Qatar and Saudi Arabia stand up for democracy in Syria and call to help their fellow Muslims there. Impressive, or? Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the democratic role models of the Middle East.
Secular “monarchies” with freedom of press and freedom to protest?! Come on! Nobody can really believe the hypocritically demands of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, just like nobody should trust the biased and partly faked coverage by al Jazeera and al Arabiya. Qatar and Saudi Arabia want to remove the “non-Islamic” leadership in Syria, which is, at least, in their eyes not Islamic, and Qatar as well as Saudi Arabia want to increase their power over Iran.
The NATO states, Gulf allies and some other governments and organizations want to prevent that Syria will be more powerful again. These NATO warmongers want to prevent real reforms in Syria, who could be benefits for the Syrian people, because the plan of destabilization, the plan of a so-called “regime change”, includes the method to bring up the civilians against their government. This is easily to understand.
Thus, some governments in the West and in the Gulf have no real interest in the welfare of the Syrian people. They have no interest that Syria will be strengthened again. These imperialistic warmongers want to further weaken Syria and to further decrease the welfare of the Syrian people. In addition, it is sad but to expect, that there will be more massacres and terrorist attacks in the upcoming days and weeks, even months, in Syria.
This is a part of the “destabilization plan” for Syria. As usually, the double-sided policy of e.g. the United States relies on the so-called terror management. It will be counterproductive again, but it seems the leaders of the West do not care about.
Because of Syria’s ties to Iran and not to be underestimated role in the region, it is not easy for the Western powers and the NATO vassals to officially invade in Syria. Just as Turkey, which has since the beginning of the crisis on the side of Assad’s opponents, and which has probably also infiltrated them politically, is not really willing to intervene in Syria officially, because even for the Turkish government in Ankara, this matter of Syria is too sensitive.
Thus, a lot of sides support the armed groups, religious radicals and criminals behind closed doors, since months. Not to mention that some sides seem very interested in the involvement of Hezbollah (Hezbollah) in this situation. Some sides have already tried to push Hezbollah into these events, but it seems that e.g. Nasrallah is a bit too smart to become another figure of the chessboard for the American games.
Today, the conversation between UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan and the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is on the agenda. It is interesting what will be published from the content of this talk between Annan and al-Assad. It is also interesting what will be released from this in Western media and which will be kept hidden by Western editorial offices for their readers and viewers.
Germany in particular, is playing an evil game when it comes to Syria and acts absolutely dependent and submissive. It seems that the pressures of the United States and some other governments and organizations must be really intensive on the German leadership (and even on German media?).
Like a source of the German state criminal office has mentioned, the United States threaten the German government, that Germany will no more receive any security information and economic benefits, when Germany is not willing to participate in this “redrawing of the Middle East”.
This source has also confirmed that the U.S. administration has made a deal with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, even some years ago already. This information seems to be finally confirmed by the recent leak of a meeting with the reincarnation of Lawrence of Arabia, Jeffrey D. Feltman.
The Syrian government repeatedly stated its interest in the implementation of the so-called Annan plan, but the terrorism and armed fights of “opposition forces” must come to an end.
For the welfare of the Syrian people and the purposes of people in the Middle East, the West should end with his false games and stop their “terror management” to achieve “regime changes” and their dubious goals and questionable intentions.