Syria: Armed opposition forces responsible for level of violence

Posted: March 5, 2012 in International
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

On Thursday evening, Baba Amr, Homs, was occupied by the regular Syrian troops. The normal citizens of Baba Amr (Baba Amro) were glad about the exemption from the armed radicals and foreign mercenaries in their streets.

Of course, Western media delivers another image about the events in Baba Amr, again partial based on the questionable information of the so-called two-man show “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” (SOHR), based in London.

From which Western media already knows that it`s not credible and that they often spread false information. Voltaire Network, e.g., calls this “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” in London an office of the Muslim Brotherhood. Considering the backgrounds and names, it`s understandable why Voltaire Network seems to convinced about that.

Shortly after the Western journalists, who were entering the country illegally, were brought to Lebanon, Amr Baba was freed by the gunmen. Whether the district was exempt by the Syrian army or that the armed mercenaries and religious extremists withdrawn from Baba Amr (Baba Amro) are two sold representations of this event.

It`s definitely true that some armed radicals and terrorists fled to Lebanon and to other “strongholds” of the violent rebellion in Syria, near the city of Homs, of course. Baba Amr is more or less completely in ruins. The electricity and water supply has collapsed. In consequence of the acts of terrorism and violence by the armed and Western-backed insurgents.

Of course, the combat against the armed radicals by the Syrian army gave the rest to it. Not to mention that an urban warfare is a awful situation for the attacking side and that the armed radicals and mercenaries were very well armed.

The image of the less armed peaceful demonstrators who only want democracy and freedom is a totally false truth and just used for propaganda purposes by Western governments and media. The citizens, who are still on site and near in Baba Amr, Homs, are in need of help.

The International Red Cross and the Syrian Red Crescent have sent an aid convoy to Homs. First, the armed insurgents didn`t allowed them to enter this district of the Syrian city of Homs, then on Friday, the Syrian army was looking for hidden armed people in this area, and the aid convoy was also not allowed to enter this district of Homs, of course.

It would have been too dangerous. Reports of raids and arrests or Reports of raids and arrests or executions were published in the Western mainstream media, but they cannot be confirmed by independent sources. Again, although Western journalists know that the “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” (SOHR) is no credible source, they still use it.

Another story about the violence of another Arab dictator is another report which sells well. Why should they care about the truth when they just would be in trouble then? Not to mention that Western media isn`t interested in independent reports, so independent journalists are not really able to sell their stories. Considering the payment, investigations which last some weeks, for a story which cannot be sold, is not really useful for freelance journalists. Investigative journalism is a fairy tale.

After the questionable surviving Western journalists were able to flee the district of Homs, and after the media center has been destroyed, the neighborhood was foreclosed. There is no news from there to the outside; this was even told by the journalists.

However, the not-credible “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” (SOHR), based in London, again knows all what happens in Syria and even in Baba Amr, Homs. For a “Observatory” with two people, very impressive. These are two contradictory statements. Who’s right?

Considering the lack of electricity and the bad situation with the phone lines and infrastructure, the dubious “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” (SOHR) again shows that they are far away from a credible and good source. Of course, Western media doesn`t care about. This so-called “Syrian Observatory” in London (London, yeah) is a useful tool for propaganda purposes and reports.

How many civilians are waiting for help in Baba Amr (Baba Amro) is also differently and depends on the source. If you read the reports of Western media, e.g. German media, you read that about 20,000 civilians are waiting for help in the Syrian city of Homs, especially in Baba Amr.

This number cannot be true. It`s an obvious lie. The number of 20,000 civilians may have been the correct number of civilians who have lived there before the so-called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) used this district of Homs as a “headquarter”.

Of course, this district of Homs, Baba Amr, from which children of the neighborhoods have always learned that they shouldn`t enter Baba Amr and especially not enter it at night. On pages that are often portrayed as untrustworthy, but more credible numbers are given.

The independent German journalist Karin Leukefeld, who knows Syria very very well, published more credible numbers. Karin Leukefeld wrote about 4000 civilians in Baba Amr, who are waiting for help. A more credible amount of civilians after the recent months.

Maybe German readers should start to trust her reports more rather than the reports of Western mainstream media which seems to be brought in line – already with the NATO war of Libya. Many of the former residents of Baba Amr (Baba Amro) already fled into the surrounding villages in the recent months. The numbers published by independent journalists like Karin Leukefeld, sound much more real and logical than the “propaganda excesses” of Western mainstream media.

But the ones which still use the dubious and not confirmed information of the “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights”, based in London, and from the new spin-off of this snack shop, the so-called “Syrian Human Rights Network”, and who still spread these lies and unverifiable information, are to blame for false propaganda and are not in line with the dogmas of real journalism.

These Western journalists seem to like exaggerations and false statements, just to sell their stories or to use false information for propaganda purposes. Journalists? Not really. After all, the false information of this “Observatory” (Voltaire Network: SOHR = office of the Muslim Brotherhood in London) is useful to sell the Syrian government as a monster and to work on the overthrow of the Syrian government and President Bashar al-Assad. A goal which the West wants to achieve, no matter how much it might cost.

The “axis of evil” (Syria – Hezbollah – Iran) has to be destroyed and the path to Iran must be paved. Not to mention the other reason, the protection of the state of Israel. The U.S. president Barack Obama even goes so far to put the attack on Iran on the same level as the protection of the United States. We already know those phrases for propaganda purposes from the war on Iraq. Weapons of mass destruction? Oh yes, Saddam was a huge threat.

Of course, the Syrian government in the capital Damascus might not be the best government on this planet. But a armed opposition which uses acts of terrorism, acts of sabotage, rape, murder and foreign support with weapons and funds, which is also against international laws, is no real opposition. Not to mention that reports should clearly speak from a “opposition” abroad because the opposition within Syria already has no interests in the dubious goals and questionable intentions of these divided oppositions abroad. Where is the agenda of the dubious “Syrian National Council” (SNC), based in Istanbul, Turkey?

Oh, after a year they still have no real serious and credible agenda. A very good opposition party, isn`t it? Why should Syrian civilians support them? For a brighter future of Syria? No way. Show us a real agenda and stop the sectarian acts and statements.

But it`s already too late. This “Syrian National Council” (similar to the Libyan National Transitional Council-Fake) has blood on its hands and the huge majority of the Syrian population is still in support with the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. They want peace and a normal life back. Syria is secular and the most people think this way.

How would other governments respond to armed gunmen who occupy districts of cities and are responsible for violence, terrorism, rape and murder? Would Britain accept armed radicals who explain a district of London as a liberated territories and new emirate, based on the Islamic Sharia laws? Would the government of France accept an armed opposition as a credible and legitimate opposition?

The so-called and violent “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), defenders of the Islamistic faith (not hard to miss, considering videos, pictures), who are supported with funds and weapons from abroad and also receive advise and training by foreign Special Forces, are no legitimate opposition. These criminals and armed radicals are a threat for every normal civilian. At the moment and in the future.

The questionable “Free Syrian Army” and the dubious “Syrian National Council” in Istanbul have no interests in negotiations which could lead to a peaceful situation and the decrease of violence in Syria.

While the Syrian government was always willing to negotiate. Their main demand the overthrow of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, an agenda or a credible program isn`t presented by them. Opposition? Abroad? Without any agenda for the future of Syria?

Maybe Austrians should found a “German National Council” in Vienna and ask for the overthrow of the German chancellor Angela Merkel. And if this won`t happen, this “German Transitional Council” to use weapons against German security forces. Overthrow the German dictator, Merkel. Why? There are sure some good reasons to find.

The West demands an end to the violence, but these Western demands are one-sided, hypocritically and even far away from the truth. The West only blames the Syrian government and army for the violence and terror in Syria. Meanwhile, the Russian stance on Syria seems to be more democratically than all the Western stances. A surprise after the last years.

Considering the Russian draft resolution, it seems to be the truth: Russia, Moscow, has a more democratically stance on the situation within Syria than France, England, Germany, Washington, Sweden (oh.. no surprise), and some other Western government.

The so-called Syrian opposition outside Syria receives a disproportionately high level of support and is not even criticize for their violent approach. Russia also demands an end of the violence in Syria, but the appeal of Moscow applies to all sites within Syria, that have taken up arms and spread violence and terror. Russia already has offered a negotiation between the Syrian government and the questionable “Syrian National Council” (SNC) in Moscow.

The Syrian government in the capital Damascus agreed immediately to this Russian offer for negotiations. The dubious heads of the “Syrian National Council” in Istanbul already rejected the Russian offer for negotiations (for peaceful solution) even before the invitation arrived.

Now, China also started to use significantly words on the situation in Syria. The Beijing government demands an end to violence by all sides. Does this also mean that the Chinese stance on Syria is more democratically than the Western stances on Syria? Wow. China calls for negotiations, to finally find a somehow politically solution and in order to protect the Syrian civilians.

China rejects the demand to overthrow the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Just as Moscow. China also rejects an international intervention in Syria, stressing that sanctions are not the right way to initiate a dialogue and an end to violence in this country of the Middle East. China and Russia continue to maintain Syria’s backs, but still seek to end the violence in the country.

With their claims and appeals, they are more credible than the Western governments that condemn only one side, the Syrian government, and which support the opposition forces in Syria with weapons. The AIPAC-darling, Hillary Clinton, even compares the Syrian President al-Assad with a war criminal. But with such accusations, Hillary Clinton just raises counter-questions.

When Bashar al-Assad is a war criminal, Hillary Clinton is also such a criminal. Even more and more are convinced that Hillary Clinton already is a war criminal. Considering Libya, Iraq and other events just like in Somalia. The external hypocritically pressure on Syria is increasing.

The one-sided condemnation, the false propaganda in Western media and the dubious interests of the West could actually lead to the situation that Saudi Arabia and Qatar not only provide weapons to radical religious extremists and foreign mercenaries in Syria, but also soldiers. One can only hope that it’s not that far.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s