Syria: Russian veto – United States are disgusted

Posted: February 6, 2012 in Sideviews
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Russia used their veto rights to prevent a Libyan pattern for Syria. Russia will never agree to a one-sided, hypocritically and false draft resolution again. At least, not after the war in Libya.

Putin is angry, disappointed and sure also feels confirmed by the hypocritically attitudes of the West. The false propaganda against Syria reached a enormous level at the end of last week. Similar to the time of the resolution against Libya (“No-Fly Zone”), the amount of propaganda became impressive. Which doesn`t mean that the reports are confirmed or true as we have stated it here already.

Media fakes, false reports and dubious sources. The NATO machinery is on full swing again – for propaganda purposes.

Anger, hatred and disappointed are deep in the conduct of the NATO force, which was able since the founding of the United Nations (UN), to perform hundreds of wars and coups. Assassinations, torture, executions, secret prisons and illegal detention centers like the famous Guantanamo, hundreds of thousands of civilians dead, kids burned by napalm, leafless forests are all on the conscience of NATO.

You are able to see the sheer rage about the veto of Russia at Susan Rice, who is known for her lack of self-control. For example, some Western media reported that Susan Rice spoke clear words after the veto of Russia against a resolution on Syria. Susan Rice said (for propaganda purpose), “We are disgusted that some members (UNSC) prevent us from doing our duty.”

The (hypocritically) logic of NATO: The largest occupation force in the world, the United States (about 63 known military bases outside the U.S.), is disgusted that there is no war in Syria. What kind of a matrix in which we live! When the Russians made the mistake of agreeing to the United Nations (UN) about the attack on Libya in March 2011, there was a war with tens of thousands dead afterwards.

This “mandatory exercise” of the United States was prevented by the Russians this weekend at the UN Security Council (UNSC). This includes a backbone. Sure a good thing. Should there be no war against Syria, Moscow would have saved tens of thousands of lives and also would have prevented an “explosion” of the Middle East by their veto against a one-sided and hypocritically draft resolution.

A resolution which condemns all violence by all sides in Syria and which contents ways to resolve the situation peacefully, would have been acceptable for Moscow. Russia even has a draft resolution on Syria, which includes good ways to solve the situation and seems to be more democratic and more in line with the true events in Syria than the so-called Arab League (AL) “peace plan” – the base for the Moroccan (originally British) draft resolution.

But the “psychological warfare” is still present in Western media and politics. Do not be fooled by it. What did the observers of the Arab League have wrote in their report?

The media

68. Since it began its work, the Mission has been the target of a vicious media campaign. Some media outlets have published unfounded statements, which they attributed to the Head of the Mission. They have also grossly exaggerated events, thereby distorting the truth.

69. Such contrived reports have helped to increase tensions among the Syrian people and undermined the observers’ work. Some media organizations were exploited in order to defame the Mission and its Head and cause the Mission to fail.

The whole Western spectacle with Syria reminds us suspiciously to the mass graves which were discovered by the NATO media in the Libyan city of Tripoli, whose “hundreds of dead” turned then out to be bones of camels. Impressive false propaganda.

Do not feed the trolls.

Listen, trolls!

First, you are not anti-American, if you call murderer in the United States murderers.

Second, trolls always deny everything, but in general they never respond on facts. That`s the general method which uncovers them.

Third, if you reject the draft resolution which was submitted by the United States, pardon UK, uh Morocco, you prevent another false war. Or would you call the chaos and violence in Libya democratic? Or would you call the looting of natural resources in Libya by the Western powers a democracy? What`s about the at least 30,000 dead? You still believe it was a democratic “No-Fly Zone”?

Fourth, we do not defend the Syrian government but we try to defend the truth about the situation in Syria and to be a source against the false propaganda of Western powers and media. If there was a massacre in the Syrian city of Homs, which friends of use (citizens in Homs) have denied this weekend, we do not need bombers, but we need observers there to uncover the truth.

Even if the truth about the Syrian city of Homs becomes public, the so-called “massacre of Homs” and the “blood night of Homs” will remain a legend of the warrior forever. Just as the false “memories” about the events in Hama years ago.  Just as the Gulf of Tonkin.

The babies in incubators. Just as the victims of the bombs by the former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Just as the weapons of mass destruction from Saddam Hussein. And and and… NATO propaganda remains in heads.

We are for peace. There is nothing more important than peace and nothing more terrible than war.

Source: „Massaker“ von Homs – Logik gegen Propaganda

Image: ningmilo /


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s